A $10,000 account that fell 60 percent holds $4,000, and returning it to $10,000 takes a 150 percent gain. Pay $600 of what is left to a service that promises to recover the loss and the required gain rises to 194 percent, because $3,400 now has to become $10,000. A recovery offer raises the bar it claims to clear, and it raises it before any trading happens. The fee is the only term in that arithmetic the offer actually controls.
The gain a recovery promise has to produce
Recovery arithmetic is asymmetric, and the asymmetry widens as the hole deepens. Every row below starts from $10,000, and the fourth column assumes a flat $600 paid out of whatever survived. These are percentages, not forecasts.
Scroll sideways to see the full table →
| Loss taken | Balance left | Gain needed to get even | Gain needed after a $600 fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 percent | $8,000 | 25 percent | 35.1 percent |
| 50 percent | $5,000 | 100 percent | 127.3 percent |
| 60 percent | $4,000 | 150 percent | 194.1 percent |
| 90 percent | $1,000 | 900 percent | 2,400 percent |
The fee works on both sides of the fraction at once. It shrinks the capital doing the work and adds itself to the amount that has to be earned. That is the same mechanism that makes a 20 percent loss need a 25 percent gain, compounded by a payment made in advance.
What the upfront fee buys
Nothing arrives first. The CFTC's advisory Don't be Re-Victimized by Recovery Frauds describes the structure as advance-fee fraud: paying upfront for the chance of a much bigger sum later, starting with deposits or other seemingly small fees. That same advisory records what follows the first payment — requests for more funds. It also names the targeting mechanism: prior victims are approached more often than non-victims, because the list of who lost how much survives the first scheme.
Impersonation is the second half of the pitch. The CFTC's advisory Don't be Re-Victimized by Recovery Frauds states that government officials never use a personal or web-based email account to make contact, which makes any domain other than .gov or .fed.us a finished answer, and that the agency itself never asks for a fee to investigate a complaint. Demands for wire transfers, cryptocurrency or prepaid gift cards sit on the same list. A registration number copied into a message authenticates nothing; checking the person who sent it is a separate step from reading it.
Where returned money actually comes from
Money that comes back arrives through named channels. FINRA's page on legitimate avenues for recovery of investment losses lists six: arbitration or mediation through FINRA, restitution ordered in SEC and FINRA enforcement actions, Fair Funds, SIPC, class actions and corporate bankruptcy proceedings. That page sets one hard number on the first route — the act behind a claim must have taken place within the past six years for the FINRA forum to hear it — and identifies the Fair Fund provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as the SEC's authority to distribute financial penalties to injured investors.
SIPC covers a different failure. Its page on what SIPC protects caps coverage at $500,000 per customer, including a $250,000 limit for cash, and applies when a brokerage firm becomes financially incapable of returning customer property. The same page states that SIPC does not cover a decline in the value of securities, and does not cover people sold worthless stock. A trading loss is not a custody failure, so the $500,000 figure never touches it.
Example: a $2,400 loss and a $300 fee
The example below is a mechanism, not a strategy. A currency-pair account loses $2,400 and has $2,400 left. A message offers recovery in 30 days for a $300 fee taken up front, paid from the remaining balance. Assumptions: no other costs, no taxes, the fee is paid once.
After the fee, $2,100 remains. Being made whole now means earning back the $2,400 that was lost plus the $300 that was paid: $2,700 on a base of $2,100, or a 128.6 percent gain. The service quoted 30 days. Nothing in the message specifies exposure, so the dollar loss per adverse price move cannot be computed from it at all.
The downside is not capped at $300 either. A pitch that collects account credentials or a deposit to a second account reaches the remaining $2,100, not just the fee. And neither outcome is covered: the original $2,400 was a decline in value, which the SIPC page excludes, and the FINRA arbitration route runs against a registered firm within that six-year window, not against an anonymous account in a group chat.
The five checks before replying
Each one is a fact to establish, not a score to total.
- The offer arrived unsolicited, and the sender chose the timing.
- A fee, deposit, bond or tax is due before anything is delivered.
- Contact details come only from the sender's own materials.
- The registration number has not been looked up through an official record you reached yourself — BrokerCheck for brokers, the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure database for advisers, the SEC's Action Lookup Tool for prior actions.
- The word guaranteed appears next to a trading result.
Anyone still holding a loss has the six-year window and the free complaint routes on FINRA's page. Those cost nothing to start, and they are the only channels that have ever returned money. An offer that skips them and asks for $600 is charging for the part you can do yourself, and urgency in the message is the tell that it knows it.
Source references
Primary sources used for this guide. Follow the links for the original scope, definitions and conditions.
- Don't be Re-Victimized by Recovery FraudsAccessed 2026-09-17
- Legitimate Avenues for Recovery of Investment LossesAccessed 2026-09-17
- What SIPC ProtectsAccessed 2026-09-17
- Check Registration: Sellers and InvestmentsAccessed 2026-09-17